• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

Transport systems and technologies

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 28.07.2025

Revised 03.11.2025

Accepted 29.12.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 2, 2025

Pages 7 -20

  • 207 Views

Suggested citation

Liashenko, V., & Yatsko, S. (2025). Study of influence of imprecision of primary information on energy consumption of rolling stock. The National Transport University Bulletin: A Scientific and Technical Journal, 28(2), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9040-2025-46-1

Study of influence of imprecision of primary information on energy consumption of rolling stock

Vadym Liashenko Serhii Yatsko

Abstract

The energy efficiency of urban rail transportation systems is a crucial indicator, as traction energy consumption  typically  accounts  for  40-60%  of  the  total  energy  consumption  of  the  transportation system. This study examines the sensitivity of energy consumption to deviations from nominal conditions under the implementation of pre-calculated optimized trajectories for electric rolling stock, considering rolling stock  with  operation  modes  typical  for  suburban  and  urban  transport.  To  determine  globally optimal  control  strategies  that  minimize  energy  consumption  while  complying  with  operational constraints,  the  study  uses  dynamic  programming  based  on  Bellman's  optimality  principle.  The optimization model divides the  track section into discrete segments  and uses the backward  induction method to establish optimal control laws, producing speed trajectories as functions of the train's current coordinates  on  a  given  gradient  profile.  The  trade-off  between  energy  and  time  is  represented  by  an indefinite Lagrange multiplier to ensure adherence to the timetable. Sensitivity analysis is performed by simulating inaccuracies in the estimates of the train's current coordinates and variations in its passenger load. Modelling of a targeted braking system has been implemented so as to ensure stopping accuracy in  the  event  of  measurement  inaccuracies.Modelling  was  performed  using  three  typical  gradient profiles,  characteristic  primarily  of  underground  railways;  for  comparison,  modelling  was  also performed on a conditional section with a negligible gradient. The research methodology allows for a quantitative assessment of the degree of energy overconsumption that may be caused by deviations in train passenger load factors and errors in the estimation of the position of rolling stock (±25 meters), which  provides  information for assessing the  effectiveness of pre-calculated optimized trajectories in real operating conditions

Keywords:

speed trajectory optimization; urban rail transport; energy efficiency; dynamic programming

References

  1. Lu, S., Hillmansen, S., Ho, T. K., & Roberts, C. (2013). Single-train trajectory optimization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 14(2), 743-750. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2012.2234118.
  2. Bellman, R. (1957). Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press.
  3. Ichikawa, S., & Miyatake, M. (2019). Energy efficient train trajectory in the railway system with moving block signaling scheme. IEEJ Journal of Industry applications, 8(4), 586-591. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejjia.8.586.
  4. Ghaviha, N., Bohlin, M., Holmberg, C., Dahlquist, E., Skoglund, R., & Jonasson, D. (2017). A driver advisory system with dynamic losses for passenger electric multiple units. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 85, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.09.010.
  5. González-Gil, A., Palacin, R., Batty, P., & Powell, J. P. (2014). A systems approach to reduce urban rail energy consumption. Energy Conversion and Management, 80, 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.060.
  6. Sanchis, I. V., & Zuriaga, P. S. (2016). An energy-efficient metro speed profiles for energy savings: application to the Valencia metro. Transportation research procedia, 18, 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.031.
  7. Yang, X., Li, X., Ning, B., & Tang, T. (2015). A survey on energy-efficient train operation for urban rail transit. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2447507.
  8. Ichikawa, K. (1968). Application of optimization theory for bounded state variable problems to the operation of train. Bulletin of JSME, 11(47), 857–865. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.11.857.
  9. Howlett, P. G., & Pudney, P. J. (1995). Energy-efficient train control. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-30840.
  10. Khmelnitsky, E. (2000). On an optimal control problem of train operation. IEEE transactions on automatic control, 45(7), 1257-1266. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.867018.
  11. Heineken, W., Richter, M., & Birth-Reichert, T. (2023). Energy-efficient train driving based on optimal control theory. Energies, 16(18), 6712. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186712.
  12. Tan, Z., Lu, S., Bao, K., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Yang, J., & Xue, F. (2018). Adaptive partial train speed trajectory optimization. Energies, 11(12), 3302. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123302.
  13. Su, S., Tang, T., Chen, L., & Liu, B. (2015). Energy-efficient train control in urban rail transit systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 229(4), 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713515648.
  14. Huang, Y., Yang, L., Tang, T., Gao, Z., Cao, F., & Li, K. (2018). Train speed profile optimization with on-board energy storage devices: A dynamic programming based approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 149-164. https://goi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.024.
  15. Gao, H., Zhang, Y., & Guo, J. (2020). A novel dynamic programming approach for optimizing driving strategy of subway trains. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 325, p. 01002). EDP Sciences. https://goi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032501002.
  16. Byun, Y. S., & Jeong, R. G. (2022). Optimization of driving speed of electric train using dynamic programming based on multi-weighted cost function. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 12857. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412857.
  17. Wang, P., Trivella, A., Goverde, R. M., & Corman, F. (2020). Train trajectory optimization for improved on-time arrival under parametric uncertainty. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 119, 102680. https://goi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102680.
  18. Zhao, N., Roberts, C., Hillmansen, S., & Nicholson, G. (2015). A multiple train trajectory optimization to minimize energy consumption and delay. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5), 2363-2372. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2388356.
  19. Scheepmaker, G. M., & Goverde, R. M. (2015). The interplay between energy-efficient train control and scheduled running time supplements. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 5(4), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2015.10.003.
  20. Gupta, S. D., Tobin, J. K., & Pavel, L. (2016). A two-step linear programming model for energy-efficient timetables in metro railway networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 93, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.07.003.
  21. Ye, H., & Liu, R. (2016). A multiphase optimal control method for multi-train control and scheduling on railway lines. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 93, 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.002.
  22. Wang, P., & Goverde, R. M. P. (2019). Multi-train trajectory optimization for energy-efficient timetabling. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(2), 621-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.034. 
  23. Liu, H., Zhou, M., Guo, X., Zhang, Z., Ning, B., & Tang, T. (2018). Timetable optimization for regenerative energy utilization in subway systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(9), 3247-3257. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2873145.
  24. Brenna, M., Foiadelli, F., & Longo, M. (2016). Application of genetic algorithms for driverless subway train energy optimization. International Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2016(1), 8073523. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8073523.
  25. Fernández-Rodríguez, A., Cucala, A. P., & Fernández-Cardador, A. (2020). An eco-driving algorithm for interoperable automatic train operation. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217705.
  26. Trivella, A., Wang, P., & Corman, F. (2021). The impact of wind on energy-efficient train control. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 10, 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtl.2020.100013.
  27. Chen, X., Li, K., Zhang, L., & Tian, Z. (2022). Robust optimization of energy-saving train trajectories under passenger load uncertainty based on p-NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 9(1), 1826-1844. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2022.3194698.
  28. Kustovska O. (2005). Methodology of Systematic Approach And Scientific Research: Lecture Course. Ekonomichna Dumka. [in Ukrainian].
  29. Liashenko, V., Yatsko, S., & Vaschenko, Y., & Khvorost, M. (2023). Simulation of the system of provision of target braking of rolling stock. Information and Control Systems on Railway Transport, 28(2), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.18664/ikszt.v28i2.283285.
  30. Liashenko, V. M., Ustenko, O. V., & Yatsko, S. I. (2025). Study of the power consumption of electric rolling stock operating with repeated short-time traction cycles on different gradients. Collection of Scientific Works of the Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport, 211, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.18664/1994-7852.211.2025.327149. [in Ukrainian].
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9040-2025-46-1

Address
03049, Ukraine, Kyiv,
19, Ivana Ogienko Str.


Email
ntu@tstjournal.org.ua

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving