• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

Transport systems and technologies

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 03.02.2025

Revised 10.12.2025

Accepted 20.06.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 1, 2025

Pages 132 -144

  • 124 Views

Suggested citation

Karnatov, S., & Gertsiy, O. (2025). Comparative analysis of the quality of fractal image compression with JPEG and JPEG2000 standards. The National Transport University Bulletin: A Scientific and Technical Journal, 28(1), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9040-2025-45-10

Comparative analysis of the quality of fractal image compression with JPEG and JPEG2000 standards

Serhii Karnatov Oleksandr Gertsiy

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three image compression methods: JPEG, JPEG2000, and fractal compression (FIC). The theoretical foundations of each method are reviewed, including the discrete cosine transform (DCT) for JPEG, the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for JPEG2000, and the iterated function system (IFS) for FIC. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated using a set of  metrics:  compression  ratio  (CR),  peak  signal-to-noise  ratio  (PSNR),  structural  similarity  index (SSIM), and the learned fragment image similarity metric (LPIPS). The analysis shows that JPEG2000 generally provides better quality at a given bitrate than JPEG, especially at high compression ratios, and  offers  additional  features  such  as  scalability,  but  this  advantage  is  rather  small.  JPEG  remains popular due to its simplicity and speed, but suffers from block artifacts. Fractal compression, despite its  theoretical  advantages,  such  as  potential  resolution  independence,  has  significant  drawbacks, including extremely slow encoding and often uncompetitive quality on general images. The application areas,  reasons  for  limited  implementation,  and  the  current  relevance  of  FIC  are  discussed.  It  is concluded that it is necessary to use various metrics for comprehensive quality assessment and that the choice of the optimal compression method depends on the specific requirements of the application

Keywords:

mage; compression lossy, lossless; fractal compression; LPIPS; PSNR; SSIM

References

  1. Russ, J. C. (2006). The image processing handbook. CRC press.
  2. Patel, N., & Sadleir, R.J. (2023). CompaCT: Lossless medical image compression via fractal pixel traversal and dynamic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13097. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13097.
  3. Li, T., Sun, Q., Fan, L., & He, K. (2025). Fractal generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17437. https://arxiv.org/html/2502.17437v1.
  4. Xiao, S., Guo, Y., Peng, H., Liu, Z., Yang, L., & Wang, Y. (2025). Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection Based on Fractal Self-Similarity in the Spectrum. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08484. https://arxiv.org/html/2503.08484v1. 
  5. Gertsiy, O., (2024). Research on graphic data formats for compact representation and comparison of images. Collection of scientific works of the State University of Infrastructure and Technologies series "Transport Systems and Technologies", (43), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9059-2024-43-14.
  6. Shrestha, B. (2005). Evaluation of JPEG2000 for lossless medical image compression. Mississippi State University Libraries. https://www.gri.msstate.edu/publications/docs/2005/03/4328BijayShrestha_2005.pdf.
  7. Garmash, V.V., Kulyk, A.Y. (2010). Blocking Artifacts Reduction Method in JPEG- images. Artificial Intelligence, (4), 177-184.
  8. Gonzalez, R. C. (2009). Digital image processing. Pearson education india.
  9. Welstead,         S.            T.            (1999). Fractal       and         wavelet    image      compression          techniques (Vol.     40).         Spie         Press.. https://doi.org/10.1117/3.353798.
  10. Zhu, L., Zeng, X., Chen, B., Chen, P., Li, Y. H., & Wang, S. (2025). Leveraging Diffusion Knowledge for Generative Image Compression with Fractal Frequency-Aware Band Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11321. https://arxiv.org/html/2503.11321v1.
  11. A. Djeacoumar, A., Mujkanovic, F., Seidel, H. P., & Leimkühler, T. (2025, April). Learning Image Fractals Using Chaotic Differentiable Point Splatting. In Computer Graphics Forum (p. e70084). https://arxiv.org/html/2502.17230v1.
  12. Chen, C. H., Yao, Y., Page, D. L., Abidi, B., Koschan, A., & Abidi, M. (2006). Objective Image Quality Evaluation for JPEG, JPEG 2000, and Vidware Vision TM. In Advances in Image and Video Technology: First Pacific Rim Symposium, PSIVT 2006, Hsinchu, Taiwan, December 10-13, 2006. Proceedings 1 (pp. 751-760). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11949534_75.
  13. Kim, J,H,, Lee K,H,, Kim, B., & Yoo, S,K, (2010). Evaluation of JPEG2000 compression efficiency by using physical factors in computed radiography images. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 56(3), 856–861. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.56.856.
  14. Gertsiy, O., & Butryk, N. (2021). Comparative analysis of compact methods representations of graphic information. Collection of scientific works of the State University of Infrastructure and Technologies series "Transport Systems and Technologies", (37), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9040-2021-37-13.
  15. Singh, S., Singh, BK, & Mohan, A. (2024). Perceptual quality assessment of compressed images using different JPEG standards. Information, 15(5), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15050261
  16. Zhang, K., Liang, J., Van Gool, L., & Timofte, R. (2021). Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision (pp. 4791-4800). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.14006.
  17. Breger, A., Biguri, A., Landman, M. S., Selby, I., Amberg, N., Brunner, E., ... & Schönlieb, C. B. (2025). A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, 1-26. https://healthmanagement.org/c/imaging/News/the-limits-of-image-quality-measures-in-healthcare.
  18. Arabboev, M., Begmatov, S., Rikhsivoev, M., Nosirov, K., & Saydiakbarov, S. (2024). A comprehensive review of image super-resolution metrics: classical and AI-based approaches. Acta IMEKO, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v13i1.1679.
  19. Patel, Y., Appalaraju, S., & Manmatha, R. (2021). Saliency driven perceptual image compression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF         winter         conference         on         applications         of         computer         vision (pp. 227-236). https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/WACV2021/papers/Patel_Saliency_Driven_Perceptual_Image_Compression_WA CV_2021_paper.pdf. 
  20. Chen, B., Li, Y., Zeng, N., & He, W. (2019). Fractal lifting wavelets for machine fault diagnosis. IEEE Access, 7, 5091250932. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2908213.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.32703/2617-9040-2025-45-10

Address
03049, Ukraine, Kyiv,
19, Ivana Ogienko Str.


Email
ntu@tstjournal.org.ua

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving